Abstract
Intonation and ambiguity resolution : the case of no. Isabelle Gaudy, University of Metz At the beginning of an utterance, no can give a negative information, agree with a negative utterance or do away with a statement. So, we notice that for a single word we get three different meanings. It can therefore be considered as an ambiguous item. If we then look at its intonative representations, we notice that the patterns are quite unrelated to the positioning on the polarity of what was said before. Rather, the intonation corresponds to different disagreement attitudes. No can be modulated or flat. The latter corresponds to an indifferent and neutral negative answer. It proves more interesting to deal with the modulated no. We can indeed make out two modulations, high low on the one hand and low high on the other hand. The former is used when the utterer feels deeply involved toward the co-utterer.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.