Abstract

Heightened responding to uncertain threat is considered a hallmark of anxiety disorder pathology. We sought to determine whether individual differences in self-reported intolerance of uncertainty (IU), a key transdiagnostic dimension in anxiety-related pathology, underlies differential recruitment of neural circuitry during cue-signalled uncertainty of threat (n = 42). In an instructed threat of shock task, cues signalled uncertain threat of shock (50%) or certain safety from shock. Ratings of arousal and valence, skin conductance response (SCR), and functional magnetic resonance imaging were acquired. Overall, participants displayed greater ratings of arousal and negative valence, SCR, and amygdala activation to uncertain threat versus safe cues. IU was not associated with greater arousal ratings, SCR, or amygdala activation to uncertain threat versus safe cues. However, we found that high IU was associated with greater ratings of negative valence and greater activity in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial rostral prefrontal cortex to uncertain threat versus safe cues. These findings suggest that during cue-signalled uncertainty of threat, individuals high in IU rate uncertain threat as aversive and engage prefrontal cortical regions known to be involved in safety-signalling and conscious threat appraisal. Taken together, these findings highlight the potential of IU in modulating safety-signalling and conscious appraisal mechanisms in situations with cue-signalled uncertainty of threat, which may be relevant to models of anxiety-related pathology.

Highlights

  • In everyday life, we often experience uncertainty and will typically try to minimise or resolve it to reduce anxiety and stress (Brosschot, Verkuil, & Thayer, 2016; Grupe & Nitschke, 2013; Hirsh, Mar & Peterson, 2012; Morriss, Gell, & van Reekum, 2019b; Peters, McEwen, & Friston, 2017)

  • For the valence rating difference score (Threat cue – Safe cue), shared variance with trait anxiety (STAI-T) made no significant contribution to the model at the first step [R2 = 0.044, F = 1.808], whilst adding intolerance of uncertainty (IU) improved the hierarchal model at trend in the second step [ΔR2 = 0.086, F(1,38) = 3.746, p = 0.06]

  • Higher IU was associated with greater recruitment of the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial rostral prefrontal cortex to cues that signalled uncertainty of threat of shock versus safety from shock, over STAI-T

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We often experience uncertainty and will typically try to minimise or resolve it to reduce anxiety and stress (Brosschot, Verkuil, & Thayer, 2016; Grupe & Nitschke, 2013; Hirsh, Mar & Peterson, 2012; Morriss, Gell, & van Reekum, 2019b; Peters, McEwen, & Friston, 2017). High levels of IU are observed across many mental health disorders with an anxiety component, such as anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (Gentes & Ruscio, 2011; McEvoy & Mahoney, 2012). On this basis, there has been a surge in IU-related research in the field of anxiety during the past decade (McEvoy, Hyett, Shihata, Price, & Strachan, 2019; Tanovic, Gee, & Joormann, 2018).

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.