Abstract

Forty years ago the collection and preservation of firsthand personal testimonies - what we have come to call - was not widespread in Britain. As a distinctive approach and methodology, oral history was nottaken seriously by the majority of academic historians, archivists, librarians, museum staff, and teachers. Yet in the intervening four decades oral history has become a radical force for change in Britain in a variety of heritage and non-heritage sectors. It has encouraged a more people-centered approach to the presentation and interpretation of the past and forced essentially paper - and artifact - based professionals to come to terms with new media. This challenge to traditional sources and ways of working has led to a period of intense scrutiny and critique of oral history as a source and technique that is unusual if not to say unparalleled. This paper assesses the challenge that oral history represents and speculates about the issues that it will face in the first decade of the 21st century.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.