Abstract

This paper examines the historical methods and motives for the incorporation of select vernacular music idioms into the American university system. We look at the history of four music genres — choral music, bands, piano music, and jazz — whose cultural status has been debated and manipulated in order to render them acceptable pedagogical topics. Drawing on the extensive literature which accompanied these debates, we present a model for the dualistic philosophical debate between utilitarian and aestheticist perspectives, and suggest that the incorporation of vernacular idioms into university curricula consistently reflects this debate. Finally, we show that the value and meaning of vernacular musics have been significant philosophical issues throughout the history of American university education.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.