Abstract
Carotid artery intima–media thickness (IMT) measurements and their interpretation in the pediatric age group represent a special challenge. We appreciate, therefore, the data given by Doyon et al1 on reference values for carotid artery IMT and distensibility.1 Given the wide variety of normal values of IMT published up to date, the large patient group included in the study of Doyon et al1 deserves special attention and should guarantee reliable results. We regret, however, that the method applied for IMT measurement seems to raise questions about the comparability of the results. The authors describe their method according to the so-called caliper method, in which manual measurement of the IMT complex is performed and punctual manual measurements (how …
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
