Abstract

The biopotency of DL-methionine (MET) and 2-hydroxy-4-[methylthio]butanoic acid (DL-HMB) for broiler chicks was determined using a semipurified diet. Based on growth rate and efficiency of feed utilization, DL-HMB was 72% as potent as DL-MET, while the potencies of L-MET and DL-MET were not different. Studies were conducted to determine if differences in intestinal absorption or urinary excretion of these compounds account for differences in bioavailability. 14C-labeled methionine sources were fed to 2- to 3-week-old broiler chicks and the extent of their absorption determined using Cr 2O 3 as a marker of digestibility. All three sources were completely absorbed in the small intestine. Urinary excretion was studied in 4- to 6-week-old broiler chicks. Saline solutions containing inulin, and 20 mmol/L L-MET, 20 mmol/L D-MET, or 5 or 20 mmol/L DL-HMB were infused intravenously. Blood and urine samples were taken at regular intervals over a 50-min period. The plasma concentrations of L-MET, D-MET, and DL-HMB increased during the course of infusion to 0.5 mmol/L. Urinary excretion of L-MET and D-MET remained less than 1% and 2.2% of the filtered load, respectively. Excretion of HMB increased from about 6% to about 18% of the filtered load as plasma concentration increased to about 0.3 mmol/L, and increased abruptly at higher plasma concentrations. Based on these data and plasma HMB concentrations determined in chicks fed DL-HMB, urinary losses of HMB would be less than 1% of the daily intake. These experiments indicate that differences of biopotency between methionine sources are not due to variations in intestinal absorption or urinary excretion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call