Abstract
In recent years, some British broadcast panel interviews have taken a particularly confrontational form. In these debate interviews, news seems to be generated as arguments provided by the interviewees who participate as protagonists of opposite positions. This paper will briefly attempt to show that interviewers’ initial challenging questions polarise interviewees’ positions and that confrontation between interviewees is an expected and normative part of the interaction. Focusing on the grammatical, lexical and sequential design of interviewers’ initial challenges, the analysis will attempt to show that these are constructed in adherence to the interviewers’ formal neutrality as provided by the turn-taking system for the news interview. The paper suggests that the debate interview cannot be adequately understood as organised according to one turn-taking system, but rather as organised by the turn-taking system for news interviews as well as by a conversational turn-taking system.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
