Abstract
Length of the interview, applicants' behavior, and interview strategy were manipulated to investigate their interactive effects on ratings and hiring decisions. 202 students viewed either a short or long interview in which the applicant displayed inappropriate or appropriate behaviors and responded to questions which either covered a variety of topics or requested more detail on topics questioned in the beginning of the interview. The behavioral manipulation affected all ratings. Interestingly, interview duration and interview strategy independently affected ratings of qualifications. These results suggest that interview duration, interview strategy, and applicants' behavior may have additive effects on perceptions of qualifications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
