Interventions in labour and birth and satisfaction with care: The Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey Findings

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether interventions in labour and birth contributed to ratings of satisfaction with these experiences, in women giving birth vaginally or attempting a vaginal birth prior to giving birth by caesarean section. Background: Ratings of satisfaction with women’s overall experience of labour and birth have long been encouraged, yet remain challenging to assess or to interpret. Methods: Data from the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey (MES) – a nationally representative sample of women who had a singleton live birth in 2005–2006 – were analysed. Associations between the number of and type of labour and birth interventions, and women’s satisfaction with the overall labour and birth experience and six aspects of caregiver interactions, were assessed. Results: Among women having vaginal births, fewer interventions during labour was significantly associated with higher overall satisfaction with the labour and birth experience (ranging from 75% of women having no interventions to 46.4% having eight or more interventions rating their experiences as ‘very postive’). The same pattern was observed for satisfaction with women’s perceptions of caregiver’s respect, concern for dignity, compassion shown to them, the information given to them, their involvement in decision making, and caregiver’s competence. Among women having unplanned caesarean sections following attempted vaginal birth, the number of interventions was not associated with satisfaction ratings; however, satisfaction ratings were consistently lower than among women giving birth vaginally. Conclusion: These findings provide support for demedicalising vaginal labour and birth as well as for optimising the potential for a vaginal birth rather than caesarean section.