Abstract

BackgroundThe Stand Up Victoria multi-component intervention successfully reduced workplace sitting time in both the short (three months) and long (12 months) term. To further understand how this intervention worked, we aimed to assess the impact of the intervention on four social-cognitive constructs, and examined whether these constructs mediated intervention effects on workplace sitting time at 3 and 12 months post-baseline.MethodsTwo hundred and thirty one office-based workers (14 worksites, single government employer) were randomised to intervention or control conditions by worksite. The intervention comprised organisational, environmental, and individual level elements. Participant characteristics and social-cognitive constructs (perceived behavioural control, barrier self-efficacy, perceived organisational norms and knowledge) were measured through a self-administered online survey at baseline, 3 months and 12 months. Workplace sitting time (min/8 h day) was measured with the activPAL3 device. Single multi-level mediation models were performed for each construct at both time points.ResultsThere were significant intervention effects at 3 months on perceived behavioural control, barrier self-efficacy and perceived organisational norms. Effects on perceived organisational norms were not significant at 12 months. Perceived behavioural control significantly mediated intervention effects at 3 months, accounting for a small portion of the total effect (indirect effect: −8.6 min/8 h day, 95% CI: −18.5, −3.6 min; 7.5% of total effect). At 12 months, barrier self-efficacy significantly mediated the intervention effects on workplace sitting time (indirect effect: −10.3 min/8 h day, 95% CI: −27.3, −2.2; 13.9% of total effect). No significant effects were observed for knowledge at either time point.ConclusionsStrategies that aim to increase workers’ perceived control and self-efficacy over their sitting time may be helpful components of sedentary behaviour interventions in the workplace. However, social-cognitive factors only partially explain variation in workplace sitting reduction. Understanding the importance of other levels of influence (particularly interpersonal and environmental) for initiating and maintaining workplace sedentary behaviour change will be informative for intervention development and refinement.Trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials register (ACTRN12611000742976) on 15 July 2011.

Highlights

  • The Stand Up Victoria multi-component intervention successfully reduced workplace sitting time in both the short and long (12 months) term

  • No previous studies have examined the social-cognitive mediators of multi-component interventions to reduce workplace sitting time. To address this evidence gap we examined short (3 month) and long (12 month) term changes in socialcognitive constructs following a worksite sedentary behaviour intervention, Stand Up Victoria (SUV)

  • Study design and participants Stand Up Victoria (SUV) was a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a multi-component workplace intervention aimed at reducing workplace sitting time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Stand Up Victoria multi-component intervention successfully reduced workplace sitting time in both the short (three months) and long (12 months) term. To further understand how this intervention worked, we aimed to assess the impact of the intervention on four social-cognitive constructs, and examined whether these constructs mediated intervention effects on workplace sitting time at 3 and 12 months post-baseline. Time spent sitting (sedentary behaviour) is an identified health risk [2, 3] and many adults accumulate large volumes of sitting during their working hours [4,5,6]. An ecological approach—targeting physical and social environmental factors, alongside individuallevel factors—is considered best practice for workplace health promotion [9] and for interventions aimed at reducing sedentary behaviour [10]. Understanding the potential role of social-cognitive factors in contributing to behavioural change may provide insight into some of these mechanisms

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call