Abstract
Proteolysis in different varieties of cheese, i.e. Cheddar, British, Dutch and Swiss types and Italian varieties, was compared by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). Urea-PAGE of the water-insoluble fraction (WISF) of cheese appeared to be unable to distinguish between Cheddar and Dutch-type cheeses, whereas it could be used to distinguish Emmental from Parmesan and both of these from Cheddar and Dutch types. Urea-PAGE of the 70%-ethanol-insoluble fraction of the water-soluble extract (WSE) showed large inter-varietal differences but there were also some intra-varietal differences. RP-HPLC of the 70%-ethanol-soluble and -insoluble fractions of the WSEs of cheeses was more effective than urea-PAGE of the WISFs or of the 70%-ethanol-insoluble fraction of the WSEs of cheeses when classifying cheese according to variety. However, analysis of a larger number of cheese samples is required to verify this result. One of the problems with using either urea-PAGE or RP-HPLC to identify cheese is that the characteristics analysed by these techniques change as ripening progresses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
