Abstract

The problem of intersubjectivity arises in Mead’s work as early as in his 1903 article entitled “The Definition of the Psychical”.1 Pursuing his previous attempts to delineate the nature of individual consciousness as the creative aspect of problem-solving conduct in the social world, Mead recognized that this creative individual consciousness stands in contrast to the empirical self and other selves of the social world insofar as it reconstructs them in its reflective activity. Thus, creative individual consciousness can be “neither me nor other”.2 The problem of intersubjectivity is viewed by Mead, then, as a question concerning the relationship between the creative nature of individual consciousness and the social world in which the empirical self is itself embedded.KeywordsSocial GroupHuman GroupSocial ConsciousnessScientific GroupSocial ObjectThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.