Abstract

The discovery of telomeric repeats in interstitial regions of plant chromosomes (ITRs) through molecular cytogenetic techniques was achieved several decades ago. However, the information is scattered and has not been critically evaluated from an evolutionary perspective. Based on the analysis of currently available data, it is shown that ITRs are widespread in major evolutionary lineages sampled. However, their presence has been detected in only 45.6% of the analysed families, 26.7% of the sampled genera, and in 23.8% of the studied species. The number of ITR sites greatly varies among congeneric species and higher taxonomic units, and range from one to 72 signals. ITR signals mostly occurs as homozygous loci in most species, however, odd numbers of ITR sites reflecting a hemizygous state have been reported in both gymnosperm and angiosperm groups. Overall, the presence of ITRs appears to be poor predictors of phylogenetic and taxonomic relatedness at most hierarchical levels. The presence of ITRs and the number of sites are not significantly associated to the number of chromosomes. The longitudinal distribution of ITR sites along the chromosome arms indicates that more than half of the ITR presences are between proximal and terminal locations (49.5%), followed by proximal (29.0%) and centromeric (21.5%) arm regions. Intraspecific variation concerning ITR site number, chromosomal locations, and the differential presence on homologous chromosome pairs has been reported in unrelated groups, even at the population level. This hypervariability and dynamism may have likely been overlooked in many lineages due to the very low sample sizes often used in cytogenetic studies.

Highlights

  • The physical package of genetic material is organised in universal structures called chromosomes

  • No significant association is detected between the total interstitial regions of plant chromosomes (ITRs) sites present in the chromosome complement and the chromosome number (Pearson correlation value r = 0.031, p = 0.6745). This is clearly evidenced in Asteraceae, where species sharing the same number of chromosomes (2n = 18) showed a wide range of ITR sites

  • The uneven taxonomic sampling performed to date is a major concern for obtaining a stable overall perspective on ITR evolution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The physical package of genetic material is organised in universal structures called chromosomes. Based the currently and chromosomal location of ITR sites and the chromosome number of theonanalysed spe‐ available data, these landmarks are evaluated by (1) detecting cies, (3) estimating the karyological utility of ITRs as phylogenetic and taxonomic markersemerging in plants,patterns of variation in presence andinvolved site number across major evolutionary lineages the and at several (4) discussing the main mechanisms in the genesis of ITRs, and (5) assessing hierarchical levels, assessing the possible associations between theplants. The drawback of molecular cytogenetic methods is that short arrays of telomeric-like sites may be undetectable by ISH [21] In these cases, DNA sequencing of interstitial chromosomal regions or whole genomes is the best available option [22]. ITR repeats detected in plants are constituted by the Arabidopsis-type (TTTAGGG), vertebrate-type (TTAGGG), and Cestrum-type (T4 -5 AGCA) sequences

ITR Sampling in Seed Plants
Occurrence
Taxonomic
The Number of ITR Sites Greatly Varies among Congeneric Species and Higher
Variable
Variable Presence and Location of ITR Sites Occur within Species
Origin of ITRs
10. Data Analysis
Findings
11. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call