Abstract

BackgroundPatients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who show features related to autoimmunity without meeting criteria for a defined connective tissue disease are categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). The present study compared clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with IPAF to patients with connective tissue disease related-interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).MethodsILD patients who were consecutively enrolled in a single institution ILD cohort between 2008 and 2015 were evaluated for the study. Clinical data had been prospectively collected, while radiologic imaging and pathologic findings were re-reviewed for the present study.ResultsOut of 305 patients with ILD, 54 (17.7%) patients met the classification of IPAF, 175 (57.4%) patients had IPF, and 76 (24.9%) patients were diagnosed with CTD-ILD. Compared to IPF, incidences of acute exacerbations in 1,3 and 5 years were significantly less in the IPAF group (p = 0.022, p = 0.026 and p = 0.007, respectively). From multivariate analysis for mortality, age (p = 0.034, HR 1.022, 95% CI: 1.002–1.044), FVC (p < 0.001, HR 0.970, 95% CI: 0.955–0.984), ILD exacerbation (p = 0.001, HR 2.074, 95% CI: 1.366–3.148), and ILD type (p = 0.047, HR 0.436, 95% CI: 0.192–0.984 (IPAF vs IPF), respectively) showed significant association.ConclusionsCompared to the other ILD groups, IPAF showed distinct clinical characteristics. The IPAF group showed better survival and less episodes of exacerbation when compared to the IPF group.

Highlights

  • Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who show features related to autoimmunity without meeting criteria for a defined connective tissue disease are categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF)

  • Seropositive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) Patients with IPF who presented with positive features of the serologic domain, but without any features of the clinical and morphologic domains of IPAF were classified as the seropositive IPF

  • IPAF characterization Among 305 patients evaluated, 54 (17.7%) patients met the classification of IPAF

Read more

Summary

Methods

ILD patients who were consecutively enrolled in a single institution ILD cohort between 2008 and 2015 were evaluated for the study. Clinical data had been prospectively collected, while radiologic imaging and pathologic findings were re-reviewed for the present study

Results
Conclusions
Background
Method
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call