Abstract
The SENSCIS trial of nintedanib versus placebo is the largest trial conducted to date in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). This trial enrolled 576 patients with an extent of fibrotic ILD on high-resolution computed tomography of >10%. Median time since first non-Raynaud symptom was 3.4 years. Almost half of the patients were receiving a stable dose of mycophenolate at baseline. Key findings of the trial included that at baseline, despite having significant lung fibrosis on HRCT and impairment in lung function, 20% of the patients did not have cough and 30% did not have dyspnoea. Over 52 weeks, a marked decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) was observed (-112.0 mL/year in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc [dcSSc] and -74.5 mL/year in patients with limited cutaneous SSc [lcSSc] in the placebo group). Loss of FVC was associated with an increased risk of SSc-related hospitalisation or death. Although certain subgroups of patients were at higher risk of progression, it was not possible to make a robust prediction of FVC decline based on baseline characteristics. The relative effect of nintedanib versus placebo on reducing the rate of FVC decline was consistent across subgroups based on factors including anti-topoisomerase I antibody (ATA) status, dcSSc vs. lcSSc, and use of mycophenolate at baseline. The side-effects of nintedanib were mainly gastrointestinal events, particularly diarrhoea. Nintedanib did not have a significant effect on skin fibrosis or health-related quality of life. Overall, the results of the SENSCIS trial support the importance of prompt identification and treatment of SSc-ILD and the consideration of nintedanib as a treatment option.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.