Abstract

We used an allograft pretreatment regimen involving lethal total-body gamma irradiation of donor rats eight days prior to transplantation to compare directly the immunogenicty of immediately-vascularized heart allografts with isolated, neovascularized pancreatic islet allografts. TBI pretreatment of heart donors (IHT) caused a modest prolongation in cardiac allograft survival compared with controls in a low-responding fully-allogeneic strain combination, Lewis-to-ACI. The addition of 10(5) donor-type dendritic cells (DCs) at the time of transplantation reversed the prolongation of IHT in this strain combination. Donor pretreatment with TBI did not lead to prolonged cardiac allograft survival in either a high-responding combination, ACI-to-Lewis, or in an MHC class II-compatible strain combination, F344-to-Lewis. In contrast, islets from irradiated donors (IIT) showed markedly prolonged survival in both low-responding (Lewis-to-ACI) and high-responding (W/F-to-Lewis) strain combinations. The addition of 10(5) donor-type DCs to the islets at the time of transplantation caused the rejection of only two of six IIT in the Lewis-to-ACI combination. Combined pretreatment regimens involving TBI-pretreated cardiac allografts--such as recipient immunosuppression with peritransplant cyclosporine (10 mg/kg on days 0, 1, and 2) or the combination of TBI (1000 cGy on day -3) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/kg on day -5) in a pretreatment regimen--did not lead to synergistic graft prolongation in the low-responding Lewis-to-ACI combination. Immunohistologic studies showed that eight days after TBI rat hearts and islet were both greater than 90% depleted of class II (0X6+) interstitial dendritic cells while class I (0X18+) expression was unchanged. IIT are able to increase class II expression when donors are treated with recombinant gamma interferon (4000 U/day on days -3, -2, and -1). MLR data showed that ACI recipients of Lewis IIT reacted normally to donor (Lewis) and third-party (W/F) stimulator cells greater than 100 days after transplantation. The apparent greater immunogenicity of heart allografts as compared with islets in this model could be due to (1) a quantitative difference between the number of residual class II-positive cells in hearts and islets or a greater nnon-MHC antigenic load in the heart grafts given its larger size, or (2) a quanlitative difference between hearts and islets due to the presence of a vascular endothelium in the immediately vascularized heart that can present alloantigen and provide a major stimulus to rejection.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.