Interspecific relationships and origins of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae revealed by partitioned Bayesian analyses of chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences

Abstract

The precise delimitation of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae is not totally resolved. Some contradicting taxonomic proposals have been published, which demonstrates the difficulties in establishing a natural classification of the families and especially in proposing a relevant treatment within the genera Taxus and Cephalotaxus. The aims of this study are to contribute to the phylogeny and specific delineation of the two conifer families on the basis of molecular data. A cladistic analysis of the sequences of five chloroplast (matK, rbcL, trnL, trnL-trnF spacer, and psbA-trnH spacer) and one nuclear (ITS) molecular markers was carried out, both individually and in combination, by distance, parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian methods. The results confirm that the two families are monophyletic. In the genus Taxus, T. floridana is the first-branching taxon; T. brevifolia and T. globosa cluster together and are sister to T. baccata; the endemic T. yunnanensis clusters with T. wallichiana in subclade B and is only distantly related with the other four Taxus species in China (subclade A); T. fuana is closer to T. baccata than to other Taxus species. Torreya jackii and A. formosana are the first-branching species within Torreya and Amentotaxus, respectively. C. koreana and C. wilsoniana could be treated as two varieties of C. harringtonia. The ancestral distribution area of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae is restricted either to Southwest China or Southeast China by DIVA analysis. The relaxed molecular clock indicates that the deepest divergences in Taxus go back to the late-Cretaceous. psbA-trnH, rbcL third codon position, and matK first codon position contributed most to the separation of taxa in Discriminant function analysis. Our results confirm, on a basis of multiple molecular markers and a complete sampling of basic species, the suggested monophyly of Taxaceae and Cephalotaxaceae and propose interspecific relationships within each group, with profound nomenclatural and taxonomic implications. Combination of partitioned Bayesian analysis and likelihood-based methods produced a more robust phylogenetic hypothesis for the two studied families.