Abstract

Ongoing global landscape change resulting from urbanization is increasingly linked to changes in species distributions and community interactions. However, relatively little is known about how urbanization influences competitive interactions among mammalian carnivores, particularly related to wild felids. We evaluated interspecific interactions between medium- and large-sized carnivores across a gradient of urbanization and multiple scales. Specifically, we investigated spatial and temporal interactions of bobcats and pumas by evaluating circadian activity patterns, broad-scale seasonal interactions, and fine-scale daily interactions in wildland-urban interface (WUI), exurban residential development, and wildland habitats. Across levels of urbanization, interspecific interactions were evaluated using two-species and single-species occupancy models with data from motion-activated cameras. As predicted, urbanization increased the opportunity for interspecific interactions between wild felids. Although pumas did not exclude bobcats from areas at broad spatial or temporal scales, bobcats responded behaviorally to the presence of pumas at finer scales, but patterns varied across levels of urbanization. In wildland habitat, bobcats avoided using areas for short temporal periods after a puma visited an area. In contrast, bobcats did not appear to avoid areas that pumas recently visited in landscapes influenced by urbanization (exurban development and WUI habitat). In addition, overlap in circadian activity patterns between bobcats and pumas increased in exurban development compared to wildland habitat. Across study areas, bobcats used sites less frequently as the number of puma photographs increased at a site. Overall, bobcats appear to shape their behavior at fine spatial and temporal scales to reduce encounters with pumas, but residential development can potentially alter these strategies and increase interaction opportunities. We explore three hypotheses to explain our results of how urbanization affected interspecific interactions that consider activity patterns, landscape configuration, and animal scent marking. Altered competitive interactions between animals in urbanized landscapes could potentially increase aggressive encounters and the frequency of disease transmission.

Highlights

  • Species interactions have long been recognized as a driving factor in shaping ecological communities and influencing the spatial and temporal distribution of animals (Darwin 1859; Schoener 1974; Carothers and Jaksic 1984). Gause (1934) demonstrated that two species with the same ecological requirements, or niches, could not occupy the same area

  • Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

  • Based on the proportion of sites that each felid was detected across the Western Slope (WS) and Front Range (FR) (Table 1), bobcats and pumas exhibited relatively high values of na€ıve occupancy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species interactions have long been recognized as a driving factor in shaping ecological communities and influencing the spatial and temporal distribution of animals (Darwin 1859; Schoener 1974; Carothers and Jaksic 1984). Gause (1934) demonstrated that two species with the same ecological requirements, or niches, could not occupy the same area (i.e., the competitive exclusion principle; Hardin 1960). Species interactions have long been recognized as a driving factor in shaping ecological communities and influencing the spatial and temporal distribution of animals (Darwin 1859; Schoener 1974; Carothers and Jaksic 1984). Gause (1934) demonstrated that two species with the same ecological requirements, or niches, could not occupy the same area (i.e., the competitive exclusion principle; Hardin 1960). Species with seemingly similar ecological requirements can coexist by exploiting different habitat features (e.g., Gause 1934; MacArthur 1958). Two species with apparently different niches can have potentially strong interactions that influence the behavior, demography, and distribution of the subordinate species (Palomares and Caro 1999).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.