Abstract

The influences of intraspecific competition on plant size inequality have been well documented, but interspecific effects on this topic remain little understood. Here we examined the effects of canopy shading and fine roots of the trees (Elaeagnus angustifolia) on size inequality of the grasses (Achnatherum splendens) in a temperate savanna community in northwest China. Three study plots of 400 m2 were divided into 4-m2 quadrats, within each of which (1) canopy shading was quantified by modeling cumulative direct solar radiation (CDSR) and (2) the root effect was quantified using an empirical relationship between tree fine root density (TFRD) and relative distance to tree bases. Morphological traits were measured to represent grass size. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was conducted to examine the relative influences of grass density, CDSR and TFRD on the coefficient of variation of grass size. Results showed that no significant correlation occurred between grass density and grass size inequality. Both CDSR and TFRD had significant negative correlations with grass size inequality, suggesting that canopy shading and the presence of fine roots of trees can, respectively, increase and reduce grass size inequality. Canopy shading and TFRD played competitive roles in determining grass size inequality, where the root effect was a stronger factor than canopy shading. The tree effects can substantially alter the intensity of water stress. In response, size inequality of the grasses could be influenced through size-specific growth/mortality and slowed size divergence. These mechanisms could operate together in the savanna community.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.