Abstract

AbstractInterspecific competition is expected when two species share resource needs. For example, secondary cavity‐nesting birds may compete vigorously for suitable nest sites both within and among species. However, little is known of whether monogamous species defend more than one nest site on their territory after breeding has begun, and in particular whether they are aggressive against other species. Defending extra nest sites may be adaptive because they may be used for renesting after a failure or to produce a second brood. We studied interactions between a monogamous, resident bird, the great tit Parus major and a migrant, the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca, providing nest boxes in woodlands in Norway. Agonistic behaviours may be subtle and easily overlooked so we experimentally placed caged male pied flycatchers near nests of great tits and at a dyad of empty nest boxes erected in the territory 25 m away. We filmed interactions between species at 21 sites in the egg‐laying period of the tit, and at 26 nest sites during incubation. Male great tits showed aggression towards the caged flycatcher both at their own nest box and at the nest boxes erected at a distance. We manipulated the external appearance of the nest boxes with painted designs around the entrances but the intensity of aggression at the empty nest boxes did not depend on whether those boxes matched the nest box with the tit nest and was not correlated with tit clutch size. Neither was the intensity of display activity at each nest box by the flycatchers that settled associated with these variables. The results are discussed in relation to hypotheses for nest site choice involving interspecific social learning and aggression.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call