Abstract
The disproportionate representation of poor, working class, and racial/ethnic minority students in special education is a wicked policy problem because its formulation involves choosing among alternative problem interpretations and associated consequences. Integrating the work of Patricia Hill Collins and Nancy Fraser, the authors propose intersectional needs politics as a two-part meta-frame for conceptualizing the disproportionality problem, which they use to show how an interplay of individual and structural forces has shaped the relationship between oppression and activism in the disability rights and civil rights movements, and to argue that framing disproportionality solely as a problem of special education practice ignores a key institutional function of special education in an unequal, stratifi ed, and racialized education system. They also use the meta-frame to show how provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act perpetuate the disproportionality problem and on this basis offer ...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
