Interrupted time-series analysis yielded an effect estimate concordant with the cluster-randomized controlled trial result

Abstract

ObjectiveWe reanalyzed the data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial (C-RCT) of a quality improvement intervention for prescribing antihypertensive medication. Our objective was to estimate the effectiveness of the intervention using both interrupted time-series (ITS) and RCT methods, and to compare the findings. Study Design and SettingWe first conducted an ITS analysis using data only from the intervention arm of the trial because our main objective was to compare the findings from an ITS analysis with the findings from the C-RCT. We used segmented regression methods to estimate changes in level or slope coincident with the intervention, controlling for baseline trend. We analyzed the C-RCT data using generalized estimating equations. Last, we estimated the intervention effect by including data from both study groups and by conducting a controlled ITS analysis of the difference between the slope and level changes in the intervention and control groups. ResultsThe estimates of absolute change resulting from the intervention were ITS analysis, 11.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.5, 13.5); C-RCT, 9.0% (95% CI: 4.9, 13.1); and the controlled ITS analysis, 14.0% (95% CI: 8.6, 19.4). ConclusionITS analysis can provide an effect estimate that is concordant with the results of a cluster-randomized trial. A broader range of comparisons from other RCTs would help to determine whether these are generalizable results.