Abstract
Recently, 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been introduced for bone imaging. Through higher signal-to-noise ratios, as compared to 1.5-T MRI, it promises to be a more powerful tool for the assessment of cortical and trabecular bone measures. The goal of our study was to compare MRI-derived cortical and trabecular bone measures to quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-derived bone mineral density (BMD). Using 3-T MRI in 51 postmenopausal women, apparent (app.) measures of bone volume/total volume, trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation were derived at the distal radius, distal tibia and calcaneus. Cortical thickness (Ct.Th) was calculated at the distal radius and distal tibia. These measures were compared to QCT-derived BMD of the spine, hip and radius. Significant correlations ( ⁎ P<.05; ⁎⁎ P<.001; ⁎⁎⁎ P<.0001) were found between spine BMD- and MRI-derived Ct.Th ( r radius=.55, ⁎ P<.05; r tibia=.67, ⁎⁎⁎ P<.0001) and app. Tb.N ( r radius=.33, ⁎ P<.05; r tibia=.35, ⁎ P<.05) at the radius and tibia. Furthermore, within the first 10 mm at the radius, an inverse correlation for Ct.Th and app. BV/TV ( r 6mm=−.56, P<.001; r 10mm=−.36, P<.05) and app. Tb.Th ( r 6mm=−.54, P<.001; r 10mm=−.41, P<.05) was found.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.