Interrelations of reconstitution activity, reactions with electron acceptors, and iron-sulfur centers in succinate dehydrogenase

Abstract

Reconstitutively active, soluble preparations of succinate dehydrogenase have been examined for the stoichiometric relationship of the covalently bound flavin to the electron paramagnetic resonance (epr) signals of the iron-sulfur centers known to be present in membrane-bound forms of the enzyme. The Fe-S center ( g = 2.01), which is paramagnetic in the oxidized state (the high-potential Fe-S cluster of the enzyme, HiPIP) and which was identified in earlier studies as a component of succinate-ubiquinone reductase (Beinert et al., 1975, Eur. J. Biochem. 54, 185), can be demonstrated in reconstitutively active, soluble preparations (0.20 to 0.35 equiv/mol of enzyme) at a significantly higher level than in enzyme preparations extracted without succinate. Studies of the kinetics of the reduction of the epr-detectable Fe-S centers revealed no difference between reconstitutively active and inactive preparations in the behavior of centers 1 and 2 and, of the oxidized Fe-S center detected in reconstitutively active preparations, only a part or none at all was reduced by succinate at catalytically significant rates. The failure to demonstrate the HiPIP center in stoichiometric amounts even when the enzyme is extracted and purified under anaerobic conditions in the presence of succinate may be due to the experimental conditions needed to convert this center to the paramagnetic state for observation, i.e., the obligatory use of artificial electron acceptors, such as ferricyanide. A procedure devised to circumvent this problem by incorporating the soluble enzyme into alkali-treated membranes resulted in a reconstituted preparation which was more stable to oxidizing agents. After incorporation into the membrane, between 50 and 100% of the HiPIP center was then detectable, suggesting a relationship between this Fe-S component and reconstitution activity. It has also been noted that, under aerobic conditions, the rates of decay of this epr signal, the reconstitution activity, and the catalytic activity of soluble preparations with low concentrations of ferricyanide as electron acceptor go parallel and may, indeed, be functions of the integrity of the same property of the protein. During this time, about half of the phenazine methosulfate reductase activity also declines, and the process is accompanied by a major increase in K m for phenazine methosulfate. The content of the two ferredoxin-type Fe-S cehters, one of which is reduced by the substrate (center 1) and the other by dithionite but not by succinate (center 2), in reconstitutively active preparations did not differ significantly from that of reconstitutively inactive, soluble preparations. On the basis of these data, the notion that the ferredoxin-type Fe-S centers or signals of reconstitutively active enzyme have properties very different from those of other preparations is considered lacking in experimental support.