Abstract
To examine interrater reliability of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT), 124 college students completed the RFFT and scored RFFT test protocols. Three questions were examined: (a) What is the relationship between RFFT scores obtained by different raters? (b) Do participants improve in RFFT scoring accuracy with practice?, and (c) Are participants who perform better on the RFFT more accurate raters? Interrater reliabilities for unique designs, design perseverations, and error ratios were .93, .74, and .66, respectively. Participants benefitted from practice on scoring with increased accuracy over five protocols. Finally, results indicated a positive relationship between performance on the RFFT and scoring accuracy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
