Abstract

BackgroundPupillary abnormalities are a common and reliable finding of brain herniation, ischaemia, and acute brain injury in critically ill patients. Reliable pupil assessment is a vital evaluation in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for neurocritical patients. AimTo evaluate inter-rater reliability of pupillary assessment among intensive care. MethodsIn this prospective, blind observational study, intensive care nurses and two researchers evaluated the pupil size, reactivity and symmetry of 200 patients with neurosurgery or neurological diseases. A total of 200 pupillary measurement sets were completed independently and blindly. ResultsThree observers –two researchers and the nurse– found fair-to-good and excellent agreements in initial pupil size evaluations of right and left pupils, respectively (ICC = 0.70, 95%; ICC = 0.75, 95%). In patients with pupil size ≥4 mm, the observers found fair-to-good agreements in both right and left pupil initial size measurements (ICC = 0.52; ICC = 0.65). Agreement in pupil symmetry was moderated (K = 0.58), and reactivity was near perfect (K = 0.89) between the three observers. ConclusionAlthough the two researchers found near perfect agreement in pupil size, symmetry and reactivity assessment, two researchers and the nurse found moderate agreement in pupil symmetry and fair-to-good agreement in pre- and post-light stimulation pupil size.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call