Interpreting the &lt;i&gt;visio Dei&lt;/i&gt; in Matthew 5:8

Francois P Viljoen

doi:10.4102/hts.v68i1.905

Abstract

The academic study of the biblical text often depends on the naïve assumption that a researcher can obtain stable knowledge of the single meaning of a text. This article investigated how the visio Dei in Matthew 5:8 has led to a variety of concepts through the centuries. This proves how different readers come to different readings. Interpreters should be aware of how their contexts impact on their understanding of meaning, but should also realise how taking cognisance of the wide variety of readings could enrich their own interpretation.

Highlights

Especially since the 18th century, the academic study of the biblical text depended largely on the assumption that by means of scientific methods a researcher could obtain a secure knowledge of the single meaning of the text
It was assumed that exegetes would have a neutral and receptive audience who would accept that one true meaning
We must be grateful that a text usually provides some stability of meaning through the ages. This historical overview of the concept of visio Dei demonstrates how the context of the reader does influence the interpretation of a text

Summary

Introduction

Especially since the 18th century, the academic study of the biblical text depended largely on the assumption that by means of scientific methods a researcher could obtain a secure knowledge of the single meaning of the text. The early Christian scholar and theologian, Origen (c.185– 254 AD), proposed a metaphorical interpretation according to which the beatitude does not refer to physical sight but to spiritual apprehension: ‘By this divine sense not of the eyes but of a pure heart, that is the mind, God can be seen by those who are worthy’ (De Principiis 1.1.9).

Results

Conclusion