Abstract

The factor of dominion should be interpreted in the light of the object and purpose of double tax treaties. Such an approach in turn helps courts to interpret the beneficial ownership requirement in the same manner as they interpret a general anti-avoidance rule. Certain courts have adopted this approach and come to the correct result.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.