Abstract

In interpreting verbal messages, humans use not only verbal information but also non-verbal signals such as facial expression. For example, when a person says “yes” with a troubled face, what he or she really means appears ambiguous. In the present study, we examined how deaf and hearing people differ in perceiving real meanings in texts accompanied by representations of facial expression. Deaf and hearing participants were asked to imagine that the face presented on the computer monitor was asked a question from another person (e.g., do you like her?). They observed either a realistic or a schematic face with a different magnitude of positive or negative expression on a computer monitor. A balloon that contained either a positive or negative text response to the question appeared at the same time as the face. Then, participants rated how much the individual on the monitor really meant it (i.e., perceived earnestness), using a 7-point scale. Results showed that the facial expression significantly modulated the perceived earnestness. The influence of positive expression on negative text responses was relatively weaker than that of negative expression on positive responses (i.e., “no” tended to mean “no” irrespective of facial expression) for both participant groups. However, this asymmetrical effect was stronger in the hearing group. These results suggest that the contribution of facial expression in perceiving real meanings from text messages is qualitatively similar but quantitatively different between deaf and hearing people.

Highlights

  • Interpreting verbal messages, perceiving others’ real meaning, and responding to them appropriately are important in successful communication

  • The present results showed that there was no significant effect related to participant hearing status in the judgment of facial expression, suggesting that the way hearing and deaf participants interpreted expression of emotion on faces did not differ

  • Past research has suggested no difference between deaf and hearing participants in interpreting the emotional valence of facial expression using human facial pictures depicting various emotions (Watanabe et al, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interpreting verbal messages, perceiving others’ real meaning, and responding to them appropriately are important in successful communication. The meanings are communicated directly in a verbal form, but in most cases, we infer them by cues that are provided explicitly or implicitly (Duncan, 1969). Most of the cues that signal the real meanings might be in visual or auditory modalities. Expressions of emotion in the face and through body movement would be cues in the visual modality, whereas prosody such as speed, intonation, and accent of the voice would be cues in the auditory modality (Scherer et al, 1991; Banse and Scherer, 1996). The recent increase of human–computer interaction and human–human communication via computer requires a person to use similar yet slightly different communication styles than a face-toface communication. The major difference is the amount of information and relative contribution

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call