Abstract
Both Kripke models and interpreted systems have been put forward as basic models of multi-agent systems and for reasoning about Knowledge in such systems. This paper enriches previous comparisons of these two forms of semantics by considering categories of models in both cases and then shows that constructions given by Lomuscio and Ryan, extend to give an adjoint equivalence between the two settings. This equivalence is exploited in a discussion of colimits of interpreted systems.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
