Abstract
The debate on interpretative conflicts in constitutional matters is a subject of continuous relevance, not only in Colombia but also in countries where there is a constitutional justice system that is strongly active in the protection of fundamental rights and in the defense of the constitution. The power to create law through the interpretation made by constitutional judges in very specific problems is a very complex issue since it involves applying constitutional regulations to cases, seeking the integration that will allow them to find the solution to the issue in question. This article, product of jurisprudential research, addresses the problem of judicial interpretation, specifying it in terms of interpretative divergences of the high Courts in Colombia, which has implied the reconfiguration of the classic scheme of the balance of powers and consequently the existence of conflicts between the powers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
