Abstract

This article examines the interpretation of the subject-to-tax clauses in Belgium's tax treaties. The interpretation of these clauses gives rise to substantial difficulties in practice because of the "exemption vaut impôt" doctrine. The article argues that the application of this doctrine, when interpreting the treaty relief provisions containing the expression "income that is taxed in the other State", leads to the same result as applying the Commentary when interpreting Art. 23 of the OECD Model, which contains the expression "income which ... may be taxed in the other Contracting State". Consequently, it is submitted that the application of the "exemption vaut impôt" doctrine should be rejected when interpreting a tax treaty containing the "is taxed" language.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.