Abstract

The article is devoted to interpretation of historical facts in Umberto Eco's novel " Baudolino ". The subject of interpretation in the novel is medieval history, in particular, the reign of the emperor Frederick Barbarossa. Eco uses the typical for the historical novel method, which is the combination of facts from chronicles and fictional elements; the events are shown by the eyes of an invented character Baudolino. Emphasizing the connection between history and modernity, Eco proposes to revise the stereotypes associated with the mentioned historical period. The portraits of historical figures are borrowed from the chronicles, however in the novel they get more emotional in the perception of the protagonist, typical cliches are replaced by individuality. The opposition of italian communes to the government of Frederick also becomes a part of Baudolino's personal history. The interpretation of many events is based on legendary sources, including local tales of the italian city Alessandria, the legends of Grail and of Prester John. The legendary material fills in the gaps in medieval history. Many events (in particular, the participation of Barbarossa in the Third Crusade) correspond to the chronicles in the descriptive part, however they acquire a fictional motivation. The mystery of the emperor's death is solved in a detective key. The novel presents various doctrines elaborated in the imperial office of Frederick, their authorship is attributed to Baudolino. In the novel «Baudolino» Umberto Eco not only interprets creatively certain facts of the past, but he also practices the postmodern concept of history, according to which the past is unknowable as objective and ultimate truth and therefore it exists only in the form of a narrative. The past and the present have no fundamental difference, the history is always interpreted from the perspective of the present.

Highlights

  • Introduction to the historiography of theCrusades (Latin chronography of 11-12 centuries)]. – Moscow: Nauka, 1966. – 380 s.3

  • The article is devoted to interpretation of historical facts in Umberto Eco 's novel " Baudolino "

  • Eco uses the typical for the historical novel method, which is the combination of facts from chronicles and fictional elements; the events are shown by the eyes of an invented character Baudolino

Read more

Summary

НАУЧНАЯ ЖИЗНЬ

Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД России. Эко использует типичный для исторического романа приём соединения фактов из хроник и вымышленных элементов, события показаны глазами вымышленного персонажа Баудолино. Существования подземного хода: «И по сей день Баудолино уносит Фридриха с поля битвы и убеходят слухи о том, что под городом существует ждает его, что и поражение можно обратить в подземный туннель – загадочный лабиринт из свою пользу: «...Все уже уверовали, что ты попроходов и коридоров, созданный на заре Сред- гиб. Однако если что-то и толкования истории: подчас интерпретация было найдено, сведений о том не сохранилось, исторического факта гораздо важнее того, что так что подземный туннель – это лишь одна из произошло в реальности, именно она формирует многих легенд, выросших вокруг эпизода осады тот образ данного события, который останется города Барбароссой» [7, p.

Эко просто не мог оставить без внимания
Такое постоянное балансирование на грани
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call