Abstract
Two Os made identifications and certainty ratings for five Canadian traffic signs under a theory of signal detectability confidence-rating paradigm. The data showed a strategy from the theory of signal detection for the task as a whole but not for each separate target. Rather than referring to five separate signal and noise distributions, Os apparently used a single-decision axis for their judgments. This outcome suggests the need for clarification of the meaning of individual d' values obtained by a multi-target confidence-rating procedure, based on theory of signal detectability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
