Abstract
We have built a computational model for individual aging trajectories of health and survival, which contains physical, functional, and biological variables, and is conditioned on demographic, lifestyle, and medical background information. We combine techniques of modern machine learning with an interpretable interaction network, where health variables are coupled by explicit pair-wise interactions within a stochastic dynamical system. Our dynamic joint interpretable network (DJIN) model is scalable to large longitudinal data sets, is predictive of individual high-dimensional health trajectories and survival from baseline health states, and infers an interpretable network of directed interactions between the health variables. The network identifies plausible physiological connections between health variables as well as clusters of strongly connected health variables. We use English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA) data to train our model and show that it performs better than multiple dedicated linear models for health outcomes and survival. We compare our model with flexible lower-dimensional latent-space models to explore the dimensionality required to accurately model aging health outcomes. Our DJIN model can be used to generate synthetic individuals that age realistically, to impute missing data, and to simulate future aging outcomes given arbitrary initial health states.
Highlights
Aging is a high-dimensional process due to the enormous number of aspects of healthy functioning that can change with age across a multitude of physical scales [1, 2]
The progression of aging is often simplified with low-dimensional summary measures to describe the overall health state
While these summary measures of aging can be used predict mortality and are correlated with adverse health outcomes, we demonstrate that the prediction of individual aging health outcomes cannot be done accurately with these lowdimensional measures, and requires a high-dimensional model
Summary
Aging is a high-dimensional process due to the enormous number of aspects of healthy functioning that can change with age across a multitude of physical scales [1, 2]. This complexity is compounded by the heterogeneity and stochasticity of individual aging outcomes [3, 4]. Strategies to simplify the complexity of aging include identifying key biomarkers that quantitatively assess the aging process [5, 6] or integrating many variables into simple and interpretable onedimensional summary measures of the progression of aging, as with “Biological Age” [7,8,9], clinical measures such as frailty [10, 11], or recent machine learning models of aging [12, 13]. There has been progress on learning interpretable summaries of aging progression [12, 13], generalizing biological-age approaches but still producing low-dimensional summaries of aging
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.