Interplay between tie strength and neighbourhood topology in complex networks

Abstract

Granovetter’s weak ties theory is a very important sociological theory according to which a correlation between edge weight and the network’s topology should exist. More specifically, the neighbourhood overlap of two nodes connected by an edge should be positively correlated with edge weight (tie strength). However, some real social networks exhibit a negative correlation—the most prominent example is the scientific collaboration network, for which overlap decreases with edge weight. It has been demonstrated that the aforementioned inconsistency with Granovetter’s theory can be alleviated in the scientific collaboration network through the use of asymmetric measures. In this paper, we explain that while asymmetric measures are often necessary to describe complex networks and to confirm Granovetter’s theory, their interpretation is not simple, and there are pitfalls that one must be wary of. The definitions of asymmetric weights and overlaps introduce structural correlations that must be filtered out. We show that correlation profiles can be used to overcome this problem. Using this technique, not only do we confirm Granovetter’s theory in various real and artificial social networks, but we also show that Granovetter-like weight-topology correlations are present in other complex networks (e.g. metabolic and neural networks). Our results suggest that Granovetter’s theory is a sociological manifestation of more general principles governing various types of complex networks.