Abstract
The interplay between lattice topology, frustration, and spin quantum number, $s$, is explored for the Heisenberg antiferromagnet (HAFM) on the 11 two-dimensional Archimedean lattices (square, honeycomb, CaVO, SHD, SrCuBO, triangle, bounce, trellis, maple-leaf, star, and kagome). We show that the coupled cluster method (CCM) provides consistently accurate results when compared to the results of other approximate methods. The CCM also provides valuable information relating to the selection of ground states and we find that this depends on spin quantum number for the kagome and star lattices. Specifically, the $\sqrt{3}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\sqrt{3}$ model state provides lower ground-state energies than those of the $q=0$ model state for the kagome and star lattices for most values of $s$. The $q=0$ model state provides lower ground-state energies only for $s=1/2$ for the kagome lattice and $s=1/2$ and $s=1$ for the star lattice. The kagome and star lattices demonstrate the least amount of magnetic ordering and the unfrustrated lattices (square, honeycomb, SHD, and CaVO) demonstrate the most magnetic ordering for all values of $s$. The SrCuBO and triangular lattices also demonstrate high levels of magnetic ordering, while the remaining lattices (bounce, maple-leaf, and trellis) tend to lie between these extremes, again for all values of $s$. These results also clearly reflect the strong increase in magnetic order with increasing spin quantum number $s$ for all lattices. The ground-state energy, ${E}_{g}/(NJ{s}^{2})$, scales with ${s}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ to first order, as expected from spin-wave theory, although the order parameter, $M/s$, scales with ${s}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ for most of the lattices only. Self-consistent spin-wave theory calculations indicated previously that $M/s$ scales with ${s}^{\ensuremath{-}2/3}$ for the kagome lattice HAFM, whereas previous CCM results (replicated here also) suggested that $M/s$ scales with ${s}^{\ensuremath{-}1/2}$. It is probable, therefore, that different scaling for $M/s$ than with ${s}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ does indeed occur for the kagome lattice. By using similar arguments, we find here also that $M/s$ scales with ${s}^{\ensuremath{-}1/3}$ for the star lattice and with ${s}^{\ensuremath{-}2/3}$ for the SrCuBO lattice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.