Abstract

This study was to examine the effect of constructivist approach on mathematical metacognition. Instructional intervention package was planned to implement through true-experimental design. Initially sixty students from ninth-grade were selected through randomly and assigned into two groups; experimental and control groups. These two groups; experimental and control groups were formed on the basis of Raven’s Progressive Matrix test scores through matched by randomization. Finally, forty-four students in which twenty-two in each group were included for interventions as a sample for this study. Inventory of metacognitive regulation as the form of pretest and posttest were administered before and after the implementing the instructional intervention. After analyzing data by using analysis of co-variance techniques, revealed that metacognitive regulation in terms of planning and monitoring skills were not improved by constructivist approach among the secondary level students.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call