Abstract

Due to ease of acquisition, fecal samples are often used in studies investigating gut microbiota. Improper handling of these samples can lead to bacterial growth and alter bacterial composition. While freezing samples at −80 °C is considered gold standard, this is not suitable for studies utilizing self-sampling by lay participants or field studies. Thus to effectively prevent bacterial growth, techniques that allow efficient fecal storage outside laboratory facilities are needed. Fecal samples were collected from three donors. From each donor feces, 45 samples were collected and stored either freshly frozen at −80 or −20 °C, or in three separate storage buffers at room temperature or 4 °C for 24 or 72 hours. Bacterial composition was analyzed using Illumina amplicon sequencing of the V4 region of the 16 S rRNA gene. While storage conditions did affect bacterial composition and diversity compared to storage at −80 °C, the variation between donors superseded the variations introduced by storage. Samples stored at −20 °C most closely resembled those stored at −80 °C. When investigating variations in bacterial composition between separate study populations, fecal samples can efficiently be stored in −20 °C freezers or in one of the presented storage buffers, without severe alterations in bacterial composition.

Highlights

  • Mixed to negative results on the ability to sustain a microbiota profile[15,16,17,18,19,21,22,25]

  • This study investigated how storage of fecal samples in DNA/RNA shield, RNAlater, PSP buffer or frozen at −20 °C affected the resulting DNA output and bacterial composition compared to −80 °C

  • Effects on bacterial composition and diversity were investigated by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mixed to negative results on the ability to sustain a microbiota profile[15,16,17,18,19,21,22,25]. Spin Stool DNA Plus Kit (PSP buffer) was able to sustain gut microbiota profile effectively for up to 48 hours. Another study investigated the effects of DNA/RNA shieldTM, and found that the buffer was effective at maintaining microbiota profiles and DNA quality in sheep[27]. While positive results have been obtained with DNA/RNA shield and PSP buffer, they have not adequately been compared to other methodologies usable by lay participants, like domestic freezers. We aimed to investigate differing storage methodologies suitable for self-sampling by lay participants, and their effects on bacterial compositions in fecal samples

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call