Abstract
BackgroundIn psychiatric care professionals perceive some patients as ‘difficult’, especially patients with long-term non-psychotic disorders. For these patients few evidence-based treatments exist. An intervention program, Interpersonal Community Psychiatric Treatment (ICPT), was developed by the authors. It was evaluated with the aim to increase effective behaviours by both patients and community psychiatric nurses (CPNs). ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility and effectiveness of an intervention program for use by CPNs in the care of ‘difficult’ patients with non-psychotic chronic disorders, in a controlled pilot study. DesignA mixed-methods quasi-experimental study using process and outcome measures across several dimensions. Measurements took place at 0, 3, and 6 months. SettingsThree community mental health centres in the centre of The Netherlands. Participants14 CPNs and 36 long-term non-psychotic patients who were perceived as ‘difficult’ were selected. Patients were offered either ICPT (20) or care as usual (16). All patients and CPNs could be followed up at all measurements. MethodsQuantitative data included type and severity of psychiatric disorder, psychosocial functioning, needs for care, quality of life and social participation. Also, service use, satisfaction with care, and quality of the therapeutic alliance were measured. Qualitative interviews were conducted with all CPNs and patients in the experimental group. ResultsICPT was found feasible by both CPNs and patients. Both the experimental and control condition showed improvement on a number of outcomes. ICPT, however, resulted in significantly better results in some areas. Patients’ social network size increased and their care utilization decreased. Also, the quality of the working alliance increased and perceived patient difficulty decreased, both as scored by professionals. ConclusionsICPT is one of very few intervention programs aimed at ‘difficult’ non-psychotic chronic patients. In this pilot study was found that it can be successfully carried out by CPNs, is generally experienced as acceptable and useful by patients and CPNs alike, and results in some significantly better effects on both process and outcome measures. In the main study, some alterations will be made to the instruction manual and training program. Also, the diagnostic interview may be briefer, and the characteristics and treatment integrity of CPNs will be included in measurements. Further controlled and randomized research is needed to test the effectiveness of the program in a larger group of patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.