Abstract
Managers often express a desire for better new-product development (NPD) through supplier integration but are just as often unsure how to bring this about and so underutilize a buy strategy or even forgo it altogether. This article argues that integrating suppliers’ design teams in complex NPD requires addressing the fundamental need in these relations for mutual transparency amongst the actors such that they may adaptively substitute knowledge exchanges for their inability to specify otherwise the finished product and subsystem designs. Reporting on a case study of a jet-aircraft development project, lower level boundary spanners are shown to enable this adaptive coordination by selectively deploying from amongst three different boundary-spanning modes to coordinate for the kind of knowledge flow necessary to the situation at hand. Formalization, colocation, and buyer cross-functionality are found to be contingencies important to one or other of these modes. This article offers implications for how better to coordinate a buy strategy for complex NPD, taking also into account the scope of supplier involvement and the level of innovation in the project.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.