Abstract
The extent of interocular interaction reflected in sequentially averaged VEPs to checkerboard onset, reversal and offset stimulation was investigated to assess the relative efficacy of the three modes of pattern stimulation. Thirty-one controls and 18 amblyopic children were studied. Components on the side of the scalp ipsilateral and contralateral to the stimulated left half-field were measured for checksizes 12′, 20′, 50′ and 80′. Binocular:monocular amplitude ratios for normals were compared with `binocular:good eye' amplitude ratios for amblyopes. The reversal P100 ratio was found to differ significantly between normals and amblyopes for 12′, 20′ and 50′ checks. Ipsilateral (CII) and contralateral (P105) onset components also differed significantly but for the smallest 12′ checks only. In controls, onset components (P105 and CIII) and, reversal components (N80 and P100) showed significantly shorter binocular as compared with monocular latencies. These latency differences were not found in amblyopes. Our results show that interocular interaction in normals is best shown by potentials which predominantly reflect macular pathway activation, and are most conspicuous for reversal N80 and P100 components. Similarly, these components demonstrated the clearest differences when comparing binocular interaction effects between controls and amblyopic subjects.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/ Evoked Potentials Section
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.