Abstract

Background: Although the supine position remains the dominant position for external-beam partial breast irradiation (EB-PBI), the advantages of administering EB-PBI in the prone position have been recognized. The interobserver variability between target volumes delineated in the different positions for EB-PBI after breast-conserving surgery needs to be investigated.Methods: Twenty-seven patients suitable for EB-PBI were enrolled from July 2016 to April 2017. Supine and prone simulation CT images were sequentially acquired for all enrolled patients during free breathing. Five experienced radiotherapists delineated the target volumes for all patients on supine and prone simulation CT images. The selected parameters, including target volumes, the coefficient of variation (COV), the matching degree (MD), and so on, were calculated to analyze the interobserver variability.Results: Regardless of the patient position, the interobserver variability between tumor bed (TB) and clinical target volume (CTV) measurements in supine and prone positions were statistically significant (F = 31.34, 19.467; 44.000, 41.985; P = 0.000, 0.001; 0.000, 0.001). The interobserver variability of COVCTV was significantly greater in the supine position than in the prone position (T = 2.64, P = 0.014). Furthermore, the interobserver variabilities of MDTB and MDCTV were statistically lower in the supine position than in the prone position (Z = −3.460, −3.195, P = 0.000, 0.001).Conclusion: When delineating the target volume for EB-PBI, the interobserver variability in the prone position was lower than that in the supine position. Hence, the administration of EB-PBI in the prone position during free breathing is a reasonable option.

Highlights

  • Partial breast irradiation (PBI) has been considered an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) for patients with early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy [1,2,3]

  • A total of 27 early-stage breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were enrolled in this study from July 2016 to April 2017

  • Our study demonstrated that for both supine and prone externalbeam partial breast irradiation (EB-partial breast irradiation (PBI)), large variability in the delineation of the tumor bed (TB) and clinical target volume (CTV) measurements can exist among breast cancer radiation oncologists

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Partial breast irradiation (PBI) has been considered an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) for patients with early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy [1,2,3]. One of the potential factors that influences the radiotherapy errors observed in target delineation is interobserver variability [7]. Previous studies [8, 9] have shown that interobserver variability widely depends on the delineation guidelines, the observers, seroma clarity, surgical clips, and other aspects. Several studies [10,11,12,13,14,15] have shown that the interobserver variability in delineating target volumes for breast cancer radiotherapy was significant. A multi-institutional study from the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) further indicated that the differences between target volumes and OARs delineated by observers for breast irradiation appear to be clinically and dosimetrically significant [17]. The interobserver variability between target volumes delineated in the different positions for EB-PBI after breast-conserving surgery needs to be investigated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call