Abstract
A random sample of 100 active electroencephalographers in the United States evaluated 10-second samples of 12 selected EEGs. The evaluations consisted of multiple-choice questions related to the age of the patient, EEG finding, artifact, and consciousness of the patient. The rate of reporting the "correct" response was examined in terms of various respondent characteristics such as EEG board certification, age, percent of time in clinical EEG work, and number of recordings interpreted annually. This study indicates that, even today, there is considerable variability in EEG interpretation, and that this variability is influenced by specific reader characteristics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
