Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the interobserver reliability (IOR) of the Tile classification system, and its potential influence on outcomes, for the interpretation of CT images of pelvic fractures by radiologists and surgeons.MethodsRetrospective data (1/2008–12/2016) from 238 patients with pelvic fractures were analyzed. Mean patient age was 44 years (SD 20); 66% were male. There were 54 Tile A, 82 Tile B, and 102 Tile C type injuries. The 30-day mortality rate was 15% (36/238). Six observers, three radiologists, and three surgeons with different levels of experience (attending/resident/intern) classified each fracture into one of the 26 second-order subcategories of the Tile classification. Weighted kappa coefficients were used to assess the IORs for the three main categories and nine first-order subcategories.ResultsThe overall IORs of the Tile system for the main categories and first-order subcategories were moderate (kappa = 0.44) and fair (kappa = 0.31), respectively. IOR was fair to moderate among radiologists, but only fair among surgeons. By level of training, IOR was moderate between attendings and between residents, whereas it was only fair between interns. IOR was moderate to substantial (kappa = 0.56–0.70) between the radiology attending and resident. Association of the Tile fracture type with 30-day mortality was present based on two out of six observer ratings.ConclusionsThe overall IOR of the Tile classification system is only fair to moderate, increases with the level of rater experience and is better among radiologists than surgeons. In the light of these findings, results from studies using this classification system must be interpreted cautiously.Key Points• The overall interobserver reliability of the Tile pelvic fracture classification is only fair to moderate.• Interobserver reliability increases with observer experience and radiologists have higher kappa coefficients than surgeons.• Interobserver reliability has an impact on the association of the Tile classification system with mortality in two out of six cases.

Highlights

  • Materials and methodsPelvic ring fractures account for approximately 3% of skeletal injuries, with a reported incidence of 23/ 100,000 persons/year [1, 2]

  • Interobserver reliability increases with observer experience and radiologists have higher kappa coefficients than surgeons

  • Interobserver reliability has an impact on the association of the Tile classification system with mortality in two out of six cases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pelvic ring fractures account for approximately 3% of skeletal injuries, with a reported incidence of 23/ 100,000 persons/year [1, 2]. They result from highenergy impacts and are usually associated with multiple injuries [3, 4]. Originally designed for use with plain radiographs, the Tile classification is routinely used based on CT images [17], which allow for a more precise evaluation of the posterior elements of the pelvic ring [18,19,20] and can further aid in identifying bleeding from pelvic sources and associated abdominal injuries [21,22,23]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call