Interobserver reliability in the Gustilo and Anderson classification of open fractures.

Abstract

The Gustilo and Anderson classification system is widely used to categorize open fractures. To assess its interobserver reliability, 10 patients with open fractures had photographic slides taken of their wound before and after operative treatment. These slides were then shown to a group of orthopaedic surgeons. After an explanation of the Gustilo and Anderson classification system and each patient's pertinent history and physical examination, the physicians were asked to classify the fracture. Agreement among the various raters was determined by Kappa analysis, which is the preferred measurement of interobserver reliability for nominal data such as classification schemes. Kappa analysis demonstrated only moderate agreement among the observers classifying open fractures using the Gustilo and Anderson system. This seems to indicate that, although useful, the Gustilo and Anderson open fracture classification system does have limitations; studies and treatment recommendations based on it should be interpreted with caution.