Interobserver agreement of current and new proposed endoscopic scores for postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease

Abstract

Background and AimsThe modified Rutgeerts’ score (mRS) is widely used for the assessment of endoscopic postoperative recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn’s disease (CD) after ileocolic resection to guide therapeutic decisions. To improve the validity and prognostic value of this endoscopic assessment, two new scores have been proposed. This study assessed the interobserver agreement of the current (mRS) and new endoscopic scores for ePOR in CD. MethodsSixteen Dutch academic and non-academic IBD specialists assessed endoscopic videos (n=71) of postoperative CD patients (n=66) retrieved from nine Dutch centers. Each video was assessed for the degree of inflammation by four gastroenterologists using the mRS and the new proposed endoscopic score: REMIND score (separate score of anastomosis and neoterminal ileum) and updated Rutgeerts score (assessment of lesions at the anastomotic line, ileal inlet, ileal body and neoterminal ileum). In addition, lesions at the ileal body, ileal inlet, neoterminal ileum, colonic and/or ileal blind loop were separately assessed. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss’ weighted kappa. ResultsFleiss’ weighted kappa for the mRS was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.74). The weighted kappa for the REMIND score was 0.73 (95% CI 0.65–0.80) for lesions in the neoterminal ileum and 0.46 (95% CI 0.35–0.58) for anastomotic lesions. The weighted kappa for the updated Rutgeerts’ score was 0.69 (95% CI 0.62–0.77). The weighted kappa for lesions in the ileal body, ileal inlet, neoterminal ileum, colonic and ileal blind loop was 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.73), 0.63 (95% CI 0.54–0.72), 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.74), 0.83 (95% CI 0.62–1.00) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.46–0.89). ConclusionThe interobserver agreement of the mRS is substantial. Similarly, the interobserver agreement is substantial for the updated Rutgeerts’ score. According to the REMIND score, the interobserver agreement was substantial for lesions in the neoterminal ileum, whereas only moderate for anastomotic lesions. Since therapeutic decisions in clinical practice are based on these assessments and these scores are used as outcome measure in clinical studies, further improvement of the interobserver agreement is essential.