Abstract
The Internet, a medium of communication, commerce and governance, is increasingly subjected to government control, like absolute Internet Suspensions. India, the world’s largest democracy, has had the largest number of such Suspensions in recent years. This is due to its internet suspension legal regime not conforming to separation of powers. In 2020, the Supreme Court in Anuradha Bhasin, extended constitutional protection to freedom of online expression. However, it failed to address the concentration of power in the Executive, and the Review mechanism being inconsistent with Principles of Natural Justice. The paper draws a comparison to the United Kingdom and the United States jurisdictions which conform to Separation of Powers, through legislative and judicial oversight respectively. These insights are utilized to devise a policy reform for India. The Suspension Rules should be replaced by a validly enacted legislation, with a review mechanism consistent with Principles of Natural Justice and with ex-ante remedies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
