Abstract
This note describes the various peer review processes applied to Internet Requests for Comments (RFCs) over a number of years, and suggests that these have been up to normal scholarly standards since at least 1992. The authors believe that these documents should be considered the equivalent of scholarly publications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
