Abstract
Abstract In some respects, internationalized criminal courts and tribunals combine all the advantages and disadvantages of both national and international criminal courts. However, this would probably not give a true picture. This is because such tribunals are highly heterogeneous; the circumstances of their creation in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Cambodia, and East Timor are extremely different; their degree of ‘internationalization’ is far from uniform; the scope of their jurisdiction varies; and their modes of functioning are hardly comparable. In addition, their common characteristics, in particular their ‘ad hocism’ and their semi-internationalization, raise specific issues compared with national courts, as well as with truly international bodies such as the International Criminal Court.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
